Up to date information about children's entertainment – film, TV, DVD and more…. from founder and president of KIDS FIRST! Ranny Levy

Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Getting Radio Interviews in the U.S. for Indie Films

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
Here is some great information by Bryan Farrish Radio Promotion about how Indie filmmakers can promote their films on the radio.

The number of people who have made independent films in the last few years has exploded. But there aren’t more theaters, nor are there more people going to theaters. So how do you promote your indie film when every other indie filmmaker is trying to do the same thing? (Namely, trying go directly to the consumer.)

Before you answer “I’ll use the web”, let’s look at a definition of the web as it can be applied to promoting indie movies. True, if you could pay to have your movie on the homepage of Myspace for 24 hours, this would be “promotion” by anyone’s definition. And you could also mass-email consumers who are likely to want your movie, but first you’d have to build up the email list (which requires some other purchase or promotion). So short of this, let’s define the web mostly as a “delivery” (mailing or download) vehicle, and leave “promotion” to things which generate immediate, trackable sales.

Which brings us to traditional media, and in particular, radio. Remember that traditional media were developed for the very purpose of selling product. And why radio? Because all other traditional media have lost LOTS of users, while radio has not. Radio is so good at reaching almost every person in the U.S. every week, that Apple finally gave up its war on radio, and is now INCLUDING a radio built-in to every new Ipod Nano (radios have already been included in the Iphone and Ipod Touch, and are slated to be included in every Google Phone). The numbers make it clear: Radio reaches 300 million Americans every week, whereas there have only been 30 million Ipods sold (10 percent).

Back to film: The way radio works for indie films is this: You do a radio interview with a principal of the film (star, director, producer, writer, even an investor), and this compelling interview will cause listeners to (1) call the phone number that you announce during the interview, or (2) visit the film website; both for the purpose of buying the movie. When radio interviews are done correctly, most of the purchases will come by phone, because of the fact that 50 percent of all radio listening is done in cars and while doing other things outside. And these listeners ALL have cell phones.

Why do film interviews work well on radio? Because radio listeners are not listening to anything else. They are only listening to your interview. By contrast, people can LOOK at many things at once (bouncing their eyes around) and thus not focus on any one thing, so although your ad/banner/text/etc may be on their screen, it is mixed into everything else that people are looking at on their computer and in their room. Thus many more “impressions” of a visual ad are required, compared to an audio interview, to generate a sale. People can’t listen to more than one thing at once (and if they try, they get annoyed). So people set things up so they are hearing just one thing: A person, a song, a telephone call, or a radio. Matter of fact, when you are being listened to by a radio listener, it is common in the broadcasting business to pretend you are talking to ONE person, not an audience, because this is how the listener thinks and feels… that you are speaking directly to THEM. They are focused on just YOU.

Then there is involvement. If you have ever been interrupted while you were doing any project at all, then you know the feeling of thinking “would you please just let me finish this first?!” It feels better to finish a project (before moving on), than it does to stop halfway through the project and try to come back to it later. Same with radio interviews. Compared to seeing ads/banners/text/etc, which can all be glanced-at and forgotten, a radio interview needs to be listened through to its end, or else the listener starts feeling that they are missing something. This phenomenon has created something called “driveway listening”, which is when people get home but don’t want to get out of their cars until an interview is finished.

This all applies directly to your radio interview. When you tell about the story of the film’s conception, casting, filming, editing, etc, especially if you INCLUDE some sound bites from the film, what you end up doing is building up the idea of the film in the listeners mind. At this point, many listeners already want the movie, and it’s just a matter of what stands between them and the purchase that will determine if they buy it. MOST sales will be right at this moment, over the phone, when you announce the purchasing phone number. Then there will be a few sales later via your site, also.

This is what makes radio so trackable. Since most movie sales come from listeners dialing their cell phones and ordering right at that moment, there is no question which radio interview did the best for you. Listeners DON’T need more selling; they are READY to buy at that moment, because of the involvement they just had listening to the principal of the film describe all the facets of the movie. And if the price of the movie is $19.99 or less (especially if it’s under $9.99), most of these listeners will not hesitate to buy it on the spot. If it’s over $19.99, you will start getting fewer orders.

What type of films make for the best radio interviews? Ones with odd, intriguing, or controversial topics, especially documentaries. These topics make for good interviews even without a film; but with one, the topic is taken to a whole new level. Movies make for great on-air-giveaway items for radio listeners too. General entertainment movies can also do well if there is some other tie-in to the radio stations, such as plot location, filming location, the industry of the plot, etc.

Who do you choose to be the person that will do the interviews? A good clear voice is important, yes, but what is most important is a jovial, likeable attitude who responds well when fun is being poked at them. Radio, even AM talk shows, do not like to be black-and-white factual all the time. Little jokes, innuendos, tongue-in-cheek comments, all work together to keep the radio hosts (and listeners) smiling. And when the hosts are smiling, they will keep you on the interview longer. The longer you are on, the more involved the listener gets, and the more times you get to announce your how-to-purchase contact info.

Read other radio interview articles here:

http://www.radio-media.com/interviews/articles/main.html

Share this page on:

CHILDREN’S MOVIES SHOW UNSAFE BEHAVIORS IN HALF THE SCENES

Monday, January 11th, 2010

While the entertainment industry has improved how it portrays high-risk behaviors, half the scenes examined in a study of films marketed to children showed unsafe behaviors, and the consequences of these behaviors were rarely shown. In the study, “Injury-Prevention Practices as Depicted in G- and PG-Rated Movies, 2003-2007,” published in the February issue of Pediatrics (appearing online Jan. 11), authors examined whether the depiction of injury-prevention practices in children’s movies has gotten better or worse over the past few years. Sixty-seven movies with a total of 958 person-scenes were examined, with 55 percent depicting children and 45 percent adults. Overall, study authors concluded that depictions of injury-prevention practices in G- and PG-rated movies have improved: 75 percent of boaters wore personal flotation devices, 56 percent of motor vehicle passengers were belted, 35 percent of pedestrians used crosswalks and 25 percent of bicyclists wore helmets. However, half the scenes depicted unsafe practices. In October 2009, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a policy statement on media violence that recommends parents actively monitor what their children are watching. Study authors conclude parents should highlight the depiction of unsafe behaviors in movies and educate children in following safe practices.
For more information contact the CDC Press Office at 404-639-3286, Lola Russell at [email protected] or Kristen Nordlund at [email protected] ]

Share this page on:

DGA Announces Nominees for Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Feature Films for 2009

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Directors Guild of America President Taylor Hackford today announced the five nominees for the DGA Award for Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Feature Film for 2009.

“The DGA Award is especially meaningful to directors because it is decided solely by their peers – the men and women who have been in the same trenches and know exactly what goes into the crafting of a unique motion picture,” said Hackford. “The five nominees for this year have each expressed an indelible vision that transported audiences to vivid vistas of cinematic art. My heartiest congratulations to all of the nominees.”

The winner will be named at the 62nd Annual DGA Awards Dinner on Saturday, January 30, 2010, at the Hyatt Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles.

The nominees are (in alphabetical order):

KATHRYN BIGELOW

“The Hurt Locker”

(Summit Entertainment)

Ms. Bigelow’s Directorial Team:

• Unit Production Manager: Tony Mark

• First Assistant Director: David Ticotin

• First Assistant Director (Canadian Unit): Lee Cleary

JAMES CAMERON

“Avatar”

(Twentieth Century Fox)

Mr. Cameron’s Directorial Team:

• Unit Production Manager: Colin Wilson

• First Assistant Director: Josh McLaglen

• Second Assistant Director/Additional Unit First Assistant Director: Maria Battle Campbell

LEE DANIELS

“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”

(Lionsgate)

Mr. Daniels’ Directorial Team:

• Unit Production Manager: Tony Hernandez

• First Assistant Director: Chip Signore

• Second Assistant Director: Tracey Hinds

• Second Second Assistant Director: Michael “Boogie” Pinckney

• Additional Unit Production Manager: Patrick D. Gibbons

• Additional First Assistant Director: Tom Fatone

• Additional Second Assistant Directors: Kim Thompson, Mirashyam Blakeslee

• Location Manager: Gregory Routt

JASON REITMAN

“Up In The Air”

(Paramount Pictures)

Mr. Reitman’s Directorial Team:

• Unit Production Manager: Michael Beugg

• First Assistant Director: Jason Blumenfeld

• Second Assistant Director: Sonia Bhalla

• Assistant Unit Production Manager: Samson Mucke

• Second Second Assistant Director: Joseph Payton

• Additional Second Assistant Director: Heather L. Hogan

QUENTIN TARANTINO

“Inglourious Basterds”

(The Weinstein Company and Universal Pictures)

Mr. Tarantino’s Directorial Team:

• Unit Production Manager: Gregor Wilson

• Unit Production Manager (Germany): Michael Scheel

• First Assistant Director: Carlos Fidel

• Second Assistant Director: Miguel Angelo Pa

• Second Second Assistant Directors: Jill Moriarty, Tanja Däberitz

Share this page on:

Avatar Review by Moving Pictures Magazine

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010
Reviewed by Rick Klaw
(December 2009)

Directed/Written by: James Cameron
Starring: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Michelle Rodriguez, Giovanni Ribisi

Twelve years after crafting the Oscar-winning best picture “Titanic” and nearly two decades since “Terminator 2,” director/screenwriter/producer James Cameron returns to the big screen and his science fiction roots with the much ballyhooed “Avatar.” Equipped with groundbreaking 3-D and graphics technology, Cameron’s nearly three-hour epic emerges as perhaps the most beautiful movie ever produced.

Avatar; courtesy WETA and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
A Na’vi warrior races into battle on a thanator, a fearsome panther-like creature native to Pandora; courtesy WETA and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

In the far future, Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a wounded and paralyzed former U.S. Marine, travels to Pandora, a lush, jungle-covered extraterrestrial moon and home to a sentient humanoid race, the Na’vi. Approximately 10-feet tall with tails and sparkling blue skin, the Na’vi fight when a human corporation, backed by battalions of Marines, attempts to remove the indigenous people from their native lands.

Unable to breathe the air on Pandora, human scientists create genetically-bred human-Na’vi hybrids known as Avatars. Jake participates in the Avatar program, which enables him to walk again though a new body. Sent deep into Pandora’s jungles as a scout, Jake encounters many of Pandora’s varied beauties and dangers.

Avatar; photo by Mark Fellman and WETA, courtesy Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Worthington: Jake (Sam Worthington) meets his avatar, a genetically engineered hybrid of human DNA mixed with DNA from the natives of Pandora; photo by Mark Fellman and WETA, courtesy Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

Complete with contrived dialogue and a telegraphed plot, the hackneyed tale derives, almost fully-formed, via the 1950s and the far more compelling fiction of Jack Vance and Robert Heinlein. Offering little in character originality, Cameron borrows heavily from his previous sci-fi endeavors. Even one of his former stars, Sigourney Weaver, returns as the head scientist for the Avatar project. The adequate acting rarely excels and at times even devolves into stereotype.

The world of the Na’vi, while intriguing, offers little that hasn’t been portrayed before. To his credit, the excellent combat scenes serve to remind filmgoers that Cameron belongs among the top tier of all-time action directors. None of this matters though. The true essence of “Avatar” rests with the impressive visual effects.

No stranger to special effects, Cameron created new advancements in that arena with several of his previous films, including both “Terminators,” “The Abyss” and “Titanic.” The 3-D and visual effects of “Avatar” far exceed anything previously seen. The extensive trailers fail to properly showcase the extent of the dazzling imagery, and offer only a glimpse of why this feature needs to be seen in the theater. Even with the lengthy running time, due primarily to the visuals, the movie doesn’t feel overly long.

Avatar; photo by Mark Fellman, courtesy Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
As an epic battle approaches, Jake (Sam Worthington, left), Grace (Sigourney Weaver), Trudy (Michelle Rodriguez) and Norm (Joel David Moore) plan their next move; photo by Mark Fellman, courtesy Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

Unlike most directors, Cameron, for the most part, uses the 3-D subtly. Realistic sweat dripping of faces enhances the tension. By giving depth, a large ship interior becomes massive. The projection screens used on the ships are fully integrated and interact seamlessly with the crew. Lighter-than-air creatures have depth and mass. All these little touches breathe life into the very alien world of “Avatar.”

The attractive Na’vi, conceived using a technology similar to that which created Gollum (in “Lord of the Rings”) and Peter Jackson’s giant ape in “King Kong,” retain a human-ness while simultaneously basking in their uniqueness. The entire Pandora landscape abounds in a lushness of detail, from the tiniest creatures to the humongous floating mountains.

By fully embracing and understanding current technologies, Cameron has created a visual delight unlike any previous movie. Even with the story flaws, the drop-dead gorgeous “Avatar” provides unforgettable entertainment.

Photo (top): Neytiri (Zoë Saldana, right) teaches Jake (Sam Worthington) the skills he’ll need to survive on Pandora; courtesy WETA and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

http://www.movingpicturesmagazine.com/reviews/movies/avatar 

Share this page on:

Wishing you a very Happy New Year!

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Thanks to Dhari Gray for this:

May this New Year be one of joy, abundance, good-will, peace and gracefulness.

May we have the courage to look for a blessing in every moment, and the audacity to celebrate it.

May compassion reign in our hearts and kindness ring through every word. May our waking dreams be filled
with joy, creativity and passionate pursuits. May our hearts and minds be joined as one; unified within, and so without.

May we remember we are all children of the Earth; kindred spirits, brothers and sisters, members of the great family of love.

May we choose love over fear; unity and harmony over separation and discord. May we have the strength to claim our authentic power; standing true in word, action and deed, and with firm resolve BE the change we wish to see in the world!

May our children see the light of love in our eyes. May our elders be honored for the wisdom each bears. May every heart trust that we are each divinely endowed with the birth-right to thrive, and wake each day celebrating the Great-Full-Ness of life.

May we remember heaven is within our hearts, opening our eyes to the sacred in all things. May we breathe thanks into each moment, and with reverence honor all of the gifts this life brings.

Share this page on:

The Princess and the Frog Reviewed by Moving Pictures Magazine

Sunday, December 27th, 2009
Reviewed by Eric Kohn
(December 2009)

Directed/Written by: Ron Clements and John Musker
Starring:  Anika Noni Rose, Bruno Campos, Keith David, Michael-Leon Wooley, Jennifer Cody, Jim Cummings, Peter Bartlett, Oprah Winfrey, Terrence Howard, John Goodman

Disney’s “The Princess and the Frog” makes history by featuring the first African American heroine in one of its animated productions but, in its old-school charm and casual pilfering of folk motifs, it offers nothing new. Instead, it offers a classic formula and makes it work: catchy songs, exotic fantasy and happy endings. The story centers on
Tiana (voiced by Aniki Noni Rose), a young waitress living in poverty amidst 1920s jazz-era New Orleans and dreaming of running a restaurant of her own. Her plight equates class and race without exploring the tension too deeply; the setting implies much about the respective social statures of whites and blacks in the city, but only as a basic framing device. In its vibrant, classically animated 2-D style, the movie gradually becomes color-blind.

The Princess and the Frog
“The Princess and the Frog”

Of course, that may have something to do with its protagonists going green. By the second act, Tiana has smooched a croaking amphibian named Prince Naveen (Bruno Campos), who’s actually a down-on-his-luck French emigré transformed into his current state by the scheming voodoo meddler Dr. Facilier (Keith David). Here, Disney mildly subverts the original parable, as Tiana’s lip-lock with Prince Naveen turns her into a frog as well. The bulk of the remaining running time morphs into an amusing road trip as the two transformed humans join forces with a trumpet-blowing gator (Michael-Leon Wooley) and a spirited lightning bug (Jim Cummings) to journey across the swamp in search of an elderly priestess with the capacity to set things right.

Strung together and mainly reliant on the comic interplay between the eventual match-made-in-heaven coupling of Tiana and her prince-to-be, “The Princess and the Frog” is likable for its familiar Disney tropes. Tiana’s personal longings provide an underlying emotional arc, and the romance holds a fundamental appeal. In general, however, the plot functions as a way station for some decent musical numbers – and a few quite remarkable ones. The setting provides the excuse for lyricist Randy Newman to let the funky rhythms flow. Dr. Facilier’s solo, “Friends from the Other Side,” offers one stand-out, but none of the tracks are hard on the ears.

The Princess and the Frog
“The Princess and the Frog”

Nor do they raise any truly problematic racial issues. I counted one or two vaguely troubling stereotypes, but nothing on the infuriating level of the lyrics from the opening sequence of “Aladdin” (“They’ll cut off your ear if they don’t like your face” sounds about as hateful as things can get), which was also directed by Ron Clements and John Musker. Their sins in this case seem far more superficial. The potential dangers are undone by the anchoring presence of two credible black protagonists (Tiana and the prince), whose ethnic nature remains safely unconnected from the fairy tale backdrop (with the exception of the voodoo element, although it could be argued that this has become more of a Southern stereotype than one specifically related to black traditions).

In his landmark 1968 tome, “The Disney Version,” Richard Schickel wrote of a “cultural neutrality” in Disney narratives that makes it difficult to take its stereotypes too seriously. And so it goes with “The Princess and the Frog.”  Rather than turning nostalgia into something more progressive, the studio has turned progressiveness into nostalgia. It’s the wildest coup d’état since Obama aped the style of JFK.

http://www.movingpicturesmagazine.com/reviews/movies/the-princess-and-the-frog

Share this page on:
Entertainment News for Kids:
Join KIDS FIRST! on Twitter Join KIDS FIRST! on YouTube Join KIDS FIRST! on Instagram Join KIDS FIRST! on Tik Tok Join KIDS FIRST! on Facebook